In this topic, if “employees have a duty of loyalty to the companies that employ them” is considered the p and “it is rational for employees to expect companies to recognize and fulfill a duty of loyalty towards their employees" will be q. It follows that q is false because it is not rational for employees to expect companies to recognize and respect loyalty to their employees. The logical form ends with not p because “It is false that employees have a duty of loyalty to the companies that employ them.” It is known that this argument is deductively valid, but to prove that the conclusion is also true, it must be true that the argument is deductively valid. An example of a deductively valid argument would be the following: Premise 1) All mammals have four feet; Premise 2) Lions are mammals; Conclusion) Therefore, lions have four feet. Premise 1 in this argument is true, mammals have four feet, premise 2 is also true, lions are mammals, and therefore the conclusion that lions have four feet is also true. With these true premises that lead to a true conclusion help us understand