Paddy Scannell's article 'Public Service Broadcasting and Modern Public Life', defending the views of the Peacock Committee, sought to remind people that public service broadcasting does not it is only a gold panning activity but also a boon for democratization. To illustrate that public service broadcasting is not created for profit, he used the BBC as an example. Taking two elements from Habermas to support his idea, these are the historical approach and the concern for the "general public" (Scannell, 1989). So, as Scannell argued, public service broadcasting has played an unconsciously beneficial role, it is fair to ask why does broadcasting play a social role in improving democracy? In other words, public service broadcasting actively contributed to the development of democracy in a global perspective or public service broadcasting simply respected the rules of the market, which means that the democracy promoted was the result of market adaptation . Public service broadcasts have two essential characteristics: the provision of a mixed program service on national channels available to all." For Scannell, the PSB is accessible to all citizens and consists of assorted programs, which is exactly the same as Habermas' public sphere: a space is guaranteed to all citizens (Habermas, 1989). According to Habermas, the public sphere is the place where public opinion can be formed. Scannell stated that B has formed a new public life in which the public (includes viewers, listeners and public), as for Scannell it could be a general public, have the right to have their own opinions. Scannell believed that B “resocialized private life” as a result of a new public life. B broke the undoubted "aura" of artists, gave communicative rights to the public. Due to the transmission is available...... middle of paper ......tion. However, whether this promotion is spontaneous or not, Scannell did not explicitly answer this question. The information I have obtained is largely due to ideology. Reference Curran, J. (2010) 'Media and Power'. London: Routledge, pp.1-39Jaromír Volek, KMSŽ FSS MU (2006)Regulation of public service broadcasting: the cases of the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Ireland.Masaryk UniversityPaddy,S.(2000),Facilities for everyone -as-someone ,in 'Media Culture Society',JAN.vol. 22 no. 1 5-24Peter,D.(1997)Communication and citizenship: journalism and the public sphere London:routledge pp.4Richards; Giles, C.(2004)'Commentary: The future of Public Service Broadcasting and the BBC', in Peacock, A.(ed.) Public Service Broadcasting without BBC .LondonStreet, J. (2001) 'Media Effects', in Mass Media, politics and democracy.Newyork:Palfrave. page. 80-99