Topic > Analysis of Medea by Euripides - 1328

The dramatic ending serves a purpose as it is meant to highlight the flaws in Greek marriage traditions. He revealed the sexism in Greek marriages with Jason and Medea. Jason was very domineering and was also portrayed as the antagonist, thus making his misdeeds very ruthless. His justification for leaving Medea was unreasonable and only made his situation worse. Jason, once the hero, is satirized by Euripides. His actions are not seen as heroic, even though he thinks of the well-being of his children. Medea, on the other hand, can be initially sympathized by seeing her suffer from the loss of her love for an unjust reason. His erratic behavior was well justified, he had the right to cry for all he had lost. However, his act of revenge got out of hand. Her act of revenge was worse than Jason's act of betrayal. His revenge adds a dramatic effect that was intended to send a message. Euripides raised a taboo aspect of marriage and divorce in Medea to show the flaws of Greek belief. Marriages were not fair, as shown in Medea. The character Medea was used to send the message that there must be justice