The purpose of this research is to critically analyze the various components of anthropology and forensic odontology in order to gain an accurate understanding of the overall reliability of these disciplines. Research obtained from various sources, including textbooks, peer-reviewed articles, and the National Academy of Sciences Report, is examined in an attempt to explain how the field of forensic odontology, more specifically the discipline of sign analysis of the bite, is not considered a reliable or credible method. source in the criminal justice system. Forensic Anthropology/Dentistry: A Critical Analysis There are many disciplines in forensic science. Some have scientifically proven their reliability, while others are still undergoing verification. One of the disciplines considered reliable is forensic anthropology. Although some aspects still do not provide 100% real information, the information provided is an estimate. These estimates still provide investigators with enough information about skeletal remains to usually begin moving forward with investigations. A subcategory of anthropology is odontology. Usually these two disciplines work closely together when identifying human remains, especially if teeth are involved. While forensic odontology is an essential aspect of helping to identify human remains, the aspect of bite mark analysis can be very unreliable and varies from case to case. The inconsistency of bite mark analysis makes this area of ​​dentistry unreliable. This article will examine how forensic anthropology is used in criminal investigations to help identify human remains. Additionally, he will look into dentistry. Finally, it will examine the unreliability of bite mark analysis. F...... half of the document ...... and to the provinces, which can lead to courtroom interrogations when forensic anthropology is used as evidence. Overall, forensic anthropology is an essential discipline in the forensic community and criminal justice system. Working closely with the anthropologist, the forensic odontologist is another key aspect in the forensic community. Like forensic anthropology, dentistry has been around for hundreds of years and has proven to be a reliable forensic discipline. However, there is a subcategory of dentistry that is not considered noteworthy. This is the bite mark analysis. In some cases, bite mark analysis has been used that has led to convictions, but overall it doesn't have much credibility in the forensic community or criminal justice system. Therefore, bite mark analysis needs further research and procedures to make it more credible and reliable.