The main difference is that while both codes of ethics place a huge emphasis on the benefit of the patient, only the AMA discusses the duties of doctors for the benefit of society . The AMA specifies that, if on the one hand the doctor's main responsibility is towards the patient and treatment, on the other hand he also has a great responsibility towards society and his profession. Additionally, the AMA emphasizes that every physician has a duty to contribute to the betterment of their community. The oath mentions the doctor's duty towards the patient and teachers, but never towards society, which I think is very important especially today. The other main difference is that the code of ethics mentions providing care with “compassion and respect for dignity and human rights,” while there is no discussion of a patient's rights or even respect for human rights (Veatch, 189 ). For me this is a big problem because I believe that every person should be aware of their rights in every area of ​​life, especially in medicine, and no one should have the right to make a decision on behalf of someone else or in this case without the patient consent. consent. The oath prohibits abortion, euthanasia and any harm to the patient. The AMA, however, mentions nothing that specifically prohibits such actions. In the oath, the doctor will leave the interventions/therapies to the specialists he consults