The Consequences of the Global Waste Trade increasing alarmingly. According to the World Bank, 1.3 billion tonnes of waste was generated globally in 2012. So, one person's footprint corresponds to 1.2 kilograms of waste per day. However, at this continuing rate of waste generation, this rate is expected to increase to produce 2.2 billion tonnes of waste globally by 2025 (World Bank Canada, 2018). To safely manage waste, all countries need to work properly on their waste management and recycling programs. Should developing countries be allowed to dispose of, for profit, toxic waste shipped to them from developed countries? No, it shouldn't be allowed. There will be many consequences related to the dumping of toxic waste from developed countries to developing countries. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayThe impending effects of this action on the environment and humans will be severe regardless of profit creation. However, toxic waste dumping can impact the atmosphere, land, water and humans. It will also cause a change in lifestyle among people who reside near such landfills or who depend on water bodies used to dump toxic waste and, more importantly, affect wildlife that feeds on toxic vegetation and toxic water. Furthermore, another argument is that many developing countries do not have solid waste management, e-waste management, and even recycling programs to deal with all the waste. Other key points include laws to stop global waste trade, for example the Basel Convention, to further demonstrate my argument that global waste trade should not be allowed. Impact on the environment There are many key points and arguments associated with the disagreement on the amount of global waste waste trading for profit. However, the main reason is the impact on the atmosphere of developing countries. Dumping toxic waste will add toxicity to the air and can cause serious health risks to people. As a result, waste disposal also affects the land and water of developing countries. According to National Geographic, waste dumped on land can cause toxicity in the air and also trigger harmful toxic chemicals to seep into the soil, poisoning aquifers and making the land barren and water unusable (National Geographic, 2009). However, if the waste were dumped into a lake, the toxicity would mostly kill all marine life. The remainder that survive may be hunted, and humans will not only consume the fish but also consume toxins such as mercury. People who depend on that water source for daily activities could go without water or face a serious health risk if they use that water (National Geographic, 2009). Although, as discussed above, some serious repercussions of toxicity caused by waste on human health, let us consider name some diseases related to air and water pollution and discuss their biological effects. The following table mentions some types of air pollution based on the possibility of developing them (Jasarevic, Thomas & Osseiran,2014). The main disease related to water pollution is diarrhea. According to the World Health Organization, it has caused up to 842,000 deaths per year globally due to lack of drinking water. Other diseases include arsenicosis, fluorosis, schistosomiasis, helminthiasis, and sepsis in children (World Health Organization, 2018). Lifestyle changes among residents If people occupy an area and waste is dumped in the area, this will prevent their access to safe and clean land. waterfall. This may force them to migrate elsewhere or travel daily to more distant places to access clean water and clean food or move daily due to poverty. An article published in the Independent (2017) claims that the lifespan of people living near or in landfill sites is 35 years. One of the many examples of these people is Amish Das, an Indian who lives with his three children, his wife and his wife's sister's family in a shack in the middle of the landfill. He wakes up and examines the garbage-filled landfill to find food for his family and that's what they feed on. Sadly, Das lost her youngest 2-year-old daughter to an illness caused by consuming all these toxins from the food they eat. This example demonstrates that many people are stuck in a cycle of poverty and yet developing countries like India take waste for profit and simply dump it on their land, making their environment toxic (Rachel England, 2017 ). Threats to Wildlife Leachate is a byproduct of water that has seeped through waste. The leachate infiltrates the soil, poisoning the aquifers (Kristianna Weber, 2016). This leads to contaminated water bodies and wildlife that depend on such water bodies for survival experience the effects. As mentioned in Silent Springs, one of the effects of leachate endured by birds is the thinning of egg shells and the loss of developing chicks (Rachel Carson, 1962). However, the WWF Living Planet Index (2016) indicates that the main cause of species deterioration is species exploitation, while the second main cause is habitat loss and degradation (World Wildlife Fund, 2016) Solid, E -Waste Management & Recycling The Urbanization Series, What A Waste highlights that some waste management practices across countries belong to various income level rankings. This helps determine the difference in waste management practices in a low- and middle-income country. In terms of recycling, it is highly unregulated and expensive in low-income countries like Pakistan, Kenya, Serbia, etc. However, middle-income countries such as Mexico, Fiji and Jamaica have regulated recycling programs and use advanced technologies and manufacturing processes, but the informal sector is still involved, but recycling rates are still quite high (Daniel Hoornweg & Perinaz Bhada-Tata, 2012). However, when it comes to solid waste, low-income countries rarely practice composting due to lack of knowledge and almost never incinerate e-waste due to high operational costs, leading to all waste ending up in landfill. However, middle-income countries practice composting, but many times fail due to contamination and operational costs. In terms of incineration of metals and other electronic waste, some incinerators are used, but such countries still suffer from financial difficulties which lead to some waste being dumped in environmentally controlled landfills (Daniel Hoornweg and Perinaz Bhada-Tata, 2012) . These data suggest that many underdeveloped and developing countries lack.

Topic > The Consequences of the Global Waste Trade increasing alarmingly. According to the World Bank, 1.3 billion tonnes of waste was generated globally in 2012. So, one person's footprint corresponds to 1.2 kilograms of waste per day. However, at this continuing rate of waste generation, this rate is expected to increase to produce 2.2 billion tonnes of waste globally by 2025 (World Bank Canada, 2018). To safely manage waste, all countries need to work properly on their waste management and recycling programs. Should developing countries be allowed to dispose of, for profit, toxic waste shipped to them from developed countries? No, it shouldn't be allowed. There will be many consequences related to the dumping of toxic waste from developed countries to developing countries. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayThe impending effects of this action on the environment and humans will be severe regardless of profit creation. However, toxic waste dumping can impact the atmosphere, land, water and humans. It will also cause a change in lifestyle among people who reside near such landfills or who depend on water bodies used to dump toxic waste and, more importantly, affect wildlife that feeds on toxic vegetation and toxic water. Furthermore, another argument is that many developing countries do not have solid waste management, e-waste management, and even recycling programs to deal with all the waste. Other key points include laws to stop global waste trade, for example the Basel Convention, to further demonstrate my argument that global waste trade should not be allowed. Impact on the environment There are many key points and arguments associated with the disagreement on the amount of global waste waste trading for profit. However, the main reason is the impact on the atmosphere of developing countries. Dumping toxic waste will add toxicity to the air and can cause serious health risks to people. As a result, waste disposal also affects the land and water of developing countries. According to National Geographic, waste dumped on land can cause toxicity in the air and also trigger harmful toxic chemicals to seep into the soil, poisoning aquifers and making the land barren and water unusable (National Geographic, 2009). However, if the waste were dumped into a lake, the toxicity would mostly kill all marine life. The remainder that survive may be hunted, and humans will not only consume the fish but also consume toxins such as mercury. People who depend on that water source for daily activities could go without water or face a serious health risk if they use that water (National Geographic, 2009). Although, as discussed above, some serious repercussions of toxicity caused by waste on human health, let us consider name some diseases related to air and water pollution and discuss their biological effects. The following table mentions some types of air pollution based on the possibility of developing them (Jasarevic, Thomas & Osseiran,2014). The main disease related to water pollution is diarrhea. According to the World Health Organization, it has caused up to 842,000 deaths per year globally due to lack of drinking water. Other diseases include arsenicosis, fluorosis, schistosomiasis, helminthiasis, and sepsis in children (World Health Organization, 2018). Lifestyle changes among residents If people occupy an area and waste is dumped in the area, this will prevent their access to safe and clean land. waterfall. This may force them to migrate elsewhere or travel daily to more distant places to access clean water and clean food or move daily due to poverty. An article published in the Independent (2017) claims that the lifespan of people living near or in landfill sites is 35 years. One of the many examples of these people is Amish Das, an Indian who lives with his three children, his wife and his wife's sister's family in a shack in the middle of the landfill. He wakes up and examines the garbage-filled landfill to find food for his family and that's what they feed on. Sadly, Das lost her youngest 2-year-old daughter to an illness caused by consuming all these toxins from the food they eat. This example demonstrates that many people are stuck in a cycle of poverty and yet developing countries like India take waste for profit and simply dump it on their land, making their environment toxic (Rachel England, 2017 ). Threats to Wildlife Leachate is a byproduct of water that has seeped through waste. The leachate infiltrates the soil, poisoning the aquifers (Kristianna Weber, 2016). This leads to contaminated water bodies and wildlife that depend on such water bodies for survival experience the effects. As mentioned in Silent Springs, one of the effects of leachate endured by birds is the thinning of egg shells and the loss of developing chicks (Rachel Carson, 1962). However, the WWF Living Planet Index (2016) indicates that the main cause of species deterioration is species exploitation, while the second main cause is habitat loss and degradation (World Wildlife Fund, 2016) Solid, E -Waste Management & Recycling The Urbanization Series, What A Waste highlights that some waste management practices across countries belong to various income level rankings. This helps determine the difference in waste management practices in a low- and middle-income country. In terms of recycling, it is highly unregulated and expensive in low-income countries like Pakistan, Kenya, Serbia, etc. However, middle-income countries such as Mexico, Fiji and Jamaica have regulated recycling programs and use advanced technologies and manufacturing processes, but the informal sector is still involved, but recycling rates are still quite high (Daniel Hoornweg & Perinaz Bhada-Tata, 2012). However, when it comes to solid waste, low-income countries rarely practice composting due to lack of knowledge and almost never incinerate e-waste due to high operational costs, leading to all waste ending up in landfill. However, middle-income countries practice composting, but many times fail due to contamination and operational costs. In terms of incineration of metals and other electronic waste, some incinerators are used, but such countries still suffer from financial difficulties which lead to some waste being dumped in environmentally controlled landfills (Daniel Hoornweg and Perinaz Bhada-Tata, 2012) . These data suggest that many underdeveloped and developing countries lack.