IndexIntroductionConclusionWorks CitedIntroductionCyberbullying is a term used to refer to the incidence of the use of words, images, or other forms of communication on the Internet that are intended to harm or injure someone other individual. The term mainly applies to such acts committed by children against other children (Hunter, 2012). If the case involves adults, the term used will no longer be considered cyberbullying. Instead we will talk about cyber harassment or cyber stalking. Currently, there is no strict law in America that prohibits this practice, despite it having disastrous effects on victims. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Children who are victims of cyberbullying end up committing murder or suicide in extreme circumstances. Other somewhat milder and less harmful effects of crime include the fact that these children will eventually be withdrawn and may drop out of school as a result. There are conflicting opinions on whether authorities should institute tougher penalties for violators of this crime. Schools are considered the most effective institutions in taming this stranglehold, but the law does not allow them to punish student misconduct committed outside campus premises. So the question is: should there be laws in place to prevail against cyberbullying? Current laws intended to tame cyberbullying are insufficient. There are no particular laws enacted that authorize school administrations to take action in response to cyberbullying committed outside of school. The children were then left to the mercy of nature at the hands of dishonest cyberbullies. The scale and scope of cyberbullying continues to grow over time and there are fears that significant harm will be done to children over the next decade if adequate laws are not put in place to tame the vice. The law currently provides for and protects students' freedom of speech and expression. It is rooted in the main law of the land. This right, however, must be used responsibly (Lipschultz, 2013). The question of how much is responsible is, however, ambiguous. It is not known to what extent freedom of expression should be allowed, especially regarding children's communications on social media. Instead, schools have their own rules that students should abide by when it comes to communicating with each other. These rules vary from school to school but share a common basis that communication should be respectful and full of mutual respect. Anything that fails to meet the minimum requirements of respecting other students is therefore deemed inappropriate and punishable. There are no cases of bullying of any kind at school. The ideal type of respect among students is maintained and dominant. It facilitates a good learning environment for all students and gives them a sense of pride regardless of the social status of their background (Malik, 2010). The problem, however, is that school authorities are not allowed to continue monitoring children once they leave school. This has been demonstrated by the numerous lawsuits that parents and children's rights movements have filed against school authorities for attempting to intervene in children's lives outside of school. Interestingly, in each case the cases hinge on free speech claims. What these lobby groups and parents appreciate is the fact that children are safer when kept under regulation of what to do and what not to do on the Internet. They focus too much on the short-term well-being of children howeverIt's about freedom of speech and expression. Technology has provided several pristine avenues that have become easy for cyberbullies to carry out their evil agenda. These cover the areas of telephone conversations and social media, which are currently the most overused form of communication leading to cyberbullying reports. Other forms include the use of anonymous Internet sites that adolescents use to threaten and intimidate each other (Trolley, 2010). It is a fact that there have been several cases where children have had to commit murder or suicide after being subjected to extreme torment due to the crimes mentioned above. The negative aspect of cyberspace, which makes it the worst avenue of bullying even more than other forms of bullying, is the fact that there is a certain sense of anonymity and little responsibility on the part of the perpetrators that push them to act that way . There is zero sense of accountability after the comments; posts and photos published on these sites are not first screened by any authority. This relative freedom has encouraged criminals to do as they wish when it comes to publishing malicious content on the web. In the next decade, America is likely to face serious cases of cyber bullying in the future. With the rapid and rapid pace of technological growth and new forms of communication arriving, it is only common sense to understand that the frequency of abuse will increase beyond the current state (Kelsey, 2014). It is also noteworthy that several features of growing communication platforms will make it easy for cyberbullying to occur in the future. These avenues touch on areas of ease of sending and receiving items online that has become the norm in the current state of technology. Communication is made easier as new inventions, especially in mobile telephony, have come with better versions of the technology that now allows people to easily send and receive images and videos. An example of the latest invention that allows people to do this is WhatsApp technology, which allows people to share and post both photos and videos, as well as send text communications. Since its invention and adoption, there have been millions of reported cases of children abusing it and bullying colleagues. It is also noted that the prevalence of such cases continues to increase over time. It is therefore well known that things will get worse in the next decade if adequate laws are not put in place to tame the situation. One of the reasons why there should be strict laws regulating the use or abuse of the Internet communication platform is that the effects of the stranglehold on victims are too harmful. They are not comparable to the violation of freedom of speech and expression that such laws will entail. For the sake of safety of children on the web, laws should be formulated to tame any misbehavior by any of them. It is a collective agreement for government, parents and school administrations to discuss and agree to limit children's rights online. The second reason why cyberbullying should be tamed is that there are many cases of school dropout or poor performance by the affected children. The level of intimidation and mental torture that children receive from the actions of bullies is not healthy for the future society that will result from this generation (McQuade, Samuel & Colt, 2012). A generation of embittered, resentful and disobedient young people. it will end up destroying the moral fabric of society. Psychologists attribute the tendency towards crime among young people to the unbalanced emotions and resentful mindset resulting from cyberbullying. The third.