Every country has its own way of developing. Some countries manage to thrive in a rapidly changing environment, while others struggle. Often, the IMF and the World Bank, which is supported by developed countries, tend to guide underdeveloped countries to make progress by introducing neoliberal policies. However, this guide will not help underdeveloped countries to change the situation assessed as that of third world countries. In terms of economic development, underdeveloped countries must maintain control of tariffs, subsidies for pillar industry, and protect infant industry from international competition. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayWhile Third World countries are not only struggling with the political situation and reforms, but also with the financial crisis and low level of education. Although the IMF and World Bank have sufficient funds and could offer help to those countries that are facing financial crises. However, aid is not their primary interest, they tend to invest in underdeveloped countries by adopting neoliberalism. Many underdeveloped countries accept it with desperation, but there are many traps and pitfalls. It is a way to maintain control over Third World nations and obtain maximum benefit for investors. For example, Jamaica is a perfect tourist destination for those who love low-cost hospitality and the beauty of nature. However, natives are inferior and have no opportunities to get jobs and decent wages. In Life and Debt, documentary filmmaker Stephanie Black shows that the current situation in the country hasn't changed much since Jamaica gained independence. The natives live in difficult conditions and are jealous of tourists who can travel and treat them like servants. The common stereotype is that Jamaicans are lazy and laid back, but in real life they try their best to please tourists as they bring in the most bang for their buck. Travelers don't pay attention to the fact that the sun causes a lack of water and that all the food they eat comes from Miami. Also, natives don't like tourists because they don't look, talk or eat like them. Jamaicans are still under the influence of the United States and European countries. They create systems and business conditions that give them the opportunity to earn substantial money, and it is difficult for Jamaicans to compete with them. It is the main reason why the IMF, World Bank and WTO manipulate them. In Life and Debt, the director wants to show the audience how the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund try to work to help implement reforms, but only deny the opportunity to Third World countries to be independent and prosper. Black shows a perfect example, where the IMF refused to provide the loan to Jamaica until they lowered the trade barriers. Therefore, foreign companies sell cheaper items which destroy local businesses. The United States has imported powdered milk which is much cheaper than real fresh milk, thus leaving native farmers without any profit. Nonetheless, Stanley Fischer, the first deputy managing director of the IMF, defends the policies and tries to convince the public that all actions are beneficial to Jamaica. However, once the milk powder company has dominated the market, as there are no local competitors, it is easy to control the market price as much as they want. In Bad Samaritans, Chang provides another example of economic development. It provides some concrete examples from several past researchers who have written aboutJapanese in the workplace. All these examples confirm that at the time people from different countries saw the Japanese as lazy and easy-going workers, and Germany was considered a slow and unfair cultural heritage. However, this did not affect the economic development of both Japan and Germany. Nowadays, their cultures are known as hardworking and passionate. With time, the culture of any country changes and it is not right to consider something as a cultural description. One of the standard characteristics of people from Third World countries is prejudice against foreigners. However, rich and emerging countries have a different organizational structure. The stereotype is that developing countries are in this condition because their natives are lazy. However, they usually have longer working hours, work with simple tools compared to developing countries, so the criticism is unfair. Chang argues that economic development depends on the economic conditions of the country, not on the personal qualities of people. Chang says it is so impossible to track and define the reasons for how countries evaluate economically. He states that emerging countries have many unemployed or underemployed people and that immigrants from these countries usually work harder than locals. Furthermore, weak law enforcement and poor educational resources are vital in the economic evaluation process. Modern economies of developed countries change people's points of view and encourage them to act differently. However, in a slowly changing economy, people are not interested in planning for the future, as it is a characteristic of those who seek new opportunities to have a better standard of living. Economic development changes culture in both positive and negative ways. According to Chang, culture is the result and cause of economic development. Usually, economic development encourages natives to become more hardworking and disciplined and not the other way around. This shows that development can spontaneously cause a cultural revolution. There is no need for cultural revolution before economic growth as their attempt rarely succeeds. People's behavior will change as they see changes and assessments in the economy. However, it will not work in societies where workers are treated poorly. Furthermore, pursuing young people in countries with small industries where having an engineering profession is wrong will not encourage them to change. The producer has high productivity and it is one of the crucial differences between rich and poor countries. Additionally, there are some key historical elements that Chang addresses effectively. He gives the example of Korea, where in the 1960s the government increased funding and the number of places in universities for engineering and science departments, because the country needed more scientists and engineers, and this had a positive result. In Japan, workers received benefits such as lifetime employment and corporate welfare programs. However, it has happened all over the world. Sweden, for example, also had terrible labor problems. There were more strikes in the 1920s than in any other country. The country's capitalists offered a generous welfare state combined with good retraining programs in exchange for limiting workers' wage demands and strikes. However, countries with low economic development will not survive if they are exposed to international competition without adequate preparation and government support. At first, they must improve their capabilities by mastering advanced technologies and building effective organizations, and then they must protect those nascent industries.