the unknown. Victor's complete lack of reasoning indirectly led to the death of his entire family. Both Prometheus and Victor skipped the thought process and assumed that their creations would be used for their imagined purpose and would have no unintended consequences whatsoever. Victor did not think about all the possibilities and was more obsessed with his new knowledge of the secret of life, than with the consequences of his impending actions. Victor's chronic irresponsibility cost him everything, including his friends, family, and the knowledge he had worked so desperately for. Victor's complete lack of wisdom and foresight cost him everything. Even if he hadn't thought about bringing it to life before, he could have at least thought of his creation as his own. This means that if Victor, after giving life to the creature, had thought of his creation as a son, the creation perhaps would never have become a monster. When the monster meets Victor later in the book, he explains that he was rejected by society, that his isolation and loneliness were the cause of his hatred and the reason for his heinous acts. The only reason the monster was upset was because he had no one to take care of him. He had no one to love, no one to love him, and the one person who was supposed to be there, to help him, nurture him, and love him, Victor, rejected this responsibility and abandoned his creation. If Victor had taken care of the monster and raised him as his own, his creation could have lived a wonderful life and all his family and friends would not have died. Finally, the article “The Monster Is Alive: 200 Years of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.” by Rajesh Basiya wants to show the modern application of Victor's mistakes and how we can learn from them through in-depth examples and modern life questions about values. Rajesh explains that our inclination and rush towards technological developments, including artificial intelligence (AI) and bioengineering, leads us to create “monsters” that are beyond our control. Rajesh proceeds to pose an open-ended question to readers: Do we, as human beings, have the authority to create life? If so, should we proceed without first knowing the consequences? Rajesh sums up Victor's mistakes by asking; Do we create monsters or are monsters born? The “monster” simply wanted what all human beings desire, incorporation and acceptance into society. He explains that the absence of these basic emotional needs based on his appearance alone has sparked outrage and hatred towards humanity. Rajesh concludes this thought by pointing out that Mary Shelley seems to blame society for her irresponsibility and attitude towards man's flaws. The monster was not born evil, he was born innocent and pure. Victor's mistake of abandoning his creation at such a young age caused a variety of effects including anger, sadness, confusion, and more. This drove the monster to seek revenge on his creator, which led to the death of most of his family. The monster was not happy with his life, he wanted more and a mate. A UCLA study suggests that a loving, caring parental figure may actually be able to alter a child's neural circuitry that could influence health and happiness for the rest of their life. their lives. The study also suggests that an abusive or neglectful parent could have the opposite effect. The monster was clearly neglected and this caused him to grow up with a certain morality. His creator's negligence made him spiteful towards Victor, which led to his outburst of rage and murder. The guilt of the death of Victor's family cannot simply be 2023).

Topic > the unknown. Victor's complete lack of reasoning indirectly led to the death of his entire family. Both Prometheus and Victor skipped the thought process and assumed that their creations would be used for their imagined purpose and would have no unintended consequences whatsoever. Victor did not think about all the possibilities and was more obsessed with his new knowledge of the secret of life, than with the consequences of his impending actions. Victor's chronic irresponsibility cost him everything, including his friends, family, and the knowledge he had worked so desperately for. Victor's complete lack of wisdom and foresight cost him everything. Even if he hadn't thought about bringing it to life before, he could have at least thought of his creation as his own. This means that if Victor, after giving life to the creature, had thought of his creation as a son, the creation perhaps would never have become a monster. When the monster meets Victor later in the book, he explains that he was rejected by society, that his isolation and loneliness were the cause of his hatred and the reason for his heinous acts. The only reason the monster was upset was because he had no one to take care of him. He had no one to love, no one to love him, and the one person who was supposed to be there, to help him, nurture him, and love him, Victor, rejected this responsibility and abandoned his creation. If Victor had taken care of the monster and raised him as his own, his creation could have lived a wonderful life and all his family and friends would not have died. Finally, the article “The Monster Is Alive: 200 Years of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.” by Rajesh Basiya wants to show the modern application of Victor's mistakes and how we can learn from them through in-depth examples and modern life questions about values. Rajesh explains that our inclination and rush towards technological developments, including artificial intelligence (AI) and bioengineering, leads us to create “monsters” that are beyond our control. Rajesh proceeds to pose an open-ended question to readers: Do we, as human beings, have the authority to create life? If so, should we proceed without first knowing the consequences? Rajesh sums up Victor's mistakes by asking; Do we create monsters or are monsters born? The “monster” simply wanted what all human beings desire, incorporation and acceptance into society. He explains that the absence of these basic emotional needs based on his appearance alone has sparked outrage and hatred towards humanity. Rajesh concludes this thought by pointing out that Mary Shelley seems to blame society for her irresponsibility and attitude towards man's flaws. The monster was not born evil, he was born innocent and pure. Victor's mistake of abandoning his creation at such a young age caused a variety of effects including anger, sadness, confusion, and more. This drove the monster to seek revenge on his creator, which led to the death of most of his family. The monster was not happy with his life, he wanted more and a mate. A UCLA study suggests that a loving, caring parental figure may actually be able to alter a child's neural circuitry that could influence health and happiness for the rest of their life. their lives. The study also suggests that an abusive or neglectful parent could have the opposite effect. The monster was clearly neglected and this caused him to grow up with a certain morality. His creator's negligence made him spiteful towards Victor, which led to his outburst of rage and murder. The guilt of the death of Victor's family cannot simply be 2023).