In this theory, I consider the response of some Pakistani press media, particularly national newspapers, each in English and Urdu, to Musharraf's rule during the period 2000- 2007; particularly in the emergencies in Pakistan in 2007 and whether the media had any influence on public opinion regarding Musharraf. The armed force conveniently threw it overboard, to organize a more favorable cast in the evolving social relations between the pillars of the state, especially the press, this I talked about in my conclusion. My main research questions are: Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay How did some sections of Pakistani media cover the events and pave the way for Musharraf to retain power until 2007? What causal relationship did the media have with the Musharraf regime's loss of power? With the specific goal in mind to answer the main research questions, I will reiterate how and why Pakistani media transitioned during the first decade of the 21st century. There are tantalizing aspects to the media's role in destroying Musharraf, which makes it such an interesting point of research. One of them is that it was Musharraf himself who allowed the proliferation of the media anyway. By proliferation in this situation I mean the deliberate efforts made by both the regime and private entities to expand the quantity and coverage of media channels. The Pakistani government established a regulatory body known as Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) in 2002 to promote and address key environmental principles in the realm of electronic media. Despite the fact that PEMRA only dealt with electronic media, it also substantially influenced the mindset and activities of the print media. It was an apt choice after Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's attempt to stifle criticism. press in Pakistan in 1998 and 1999.12 This would suggest that the press was free, even before Musharraf. However, this may be partly true: the fight against the Nawaz regime by the Jang group and others created space, at the critical moment, when Musharraf came to power. The media has had more breathing room to criticize the administration; as indicated by Hijab Shah of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC. Some sources, in the discussions, have the same idea that the media was freer to examine the government under Musharraf's early days, compared to past governments. There may be real reasons behind this increased scrutiny: As the size of electronic and print media has grown, so has critical analysis by experts on talk shows. This also influenced the press, which was able to take full advantage of the opportunities offered by the electronic media. With an all-encompassing electronic media, print media may have acquired the means to piggyback on electronic media. In this way the effect of the media on the general Pakistani public has multiplied much more. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay I didn't need to dig any deeper to find it, more often than not, the same media houses controlled both the biggest TV channels and the biggest newspapers. As needs arise, one might expect the activities of electronic and print media to synchronize. I will analyze the progression of electronic media in light of the fact that the advancement of electronic media may have given print media more opportunities.