As I read this brilliant historical read entitled “The Madness of Empire” I realized that the article is about past President Bush and his administration who failed to learn from past attempts of American imperialism. This represents past presidents in a rather shameful way through American imperialism as the prime example of President Bush. You know that in history politicians often rewrite history for their own purposes, but as Bush's Iraq analogy suggests, there was more than passing significance in his revision of the history of the Spanish-American War. Bush has made many mistakes by ignoring those of the past and has meant that some people in the country, just like this author, would have had many headaches and pains if he had only thought about and paid attention to history. First, according to the article and reading, if President Bush had simply applied the lessons and rules to America's plans to invade Iraq and transform the Middle East, perhaps it would not have turned out the way it did if at least had done it. more carefully and could have moved forward more cautiously and in a mobile manner, compared to the way he did it. People say they either didn't know about them or just ignored them and did what they wanted to do according to their mentality. You know, in a big way, the Spanish-American War and its aftermath marked a turning point in American foreign policy. You know, in a very sad and confusing way, by going to war against Spain in the Pacific and the Caribbean and establishing what it saw as a stepping stone into the Chinese market, I think the United States of America in this way had abandoned its own subtle isolation and threw itself into the world struggle thanks to Bush's willful disregard of history. Then we know, according to the author in the article “history is not physical. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayStudying the past does not produce permanent laws that allow one to predict the future with the same certainty with which a physicist can trace the path and speed of a falling object. But historical experiences provide lessons that convince people and their leaders to change their behavior to avoid predictable and unwanted sanctions.” What this means to me is that we cannot simply take things from history lightly, we must study it and remember it, to move forward and create a better and greater country, there is no way to know what is right from wrong until the right and wrong mistakes, and it is only through trial and error that the United States can move forward with past mistakes in history through chaos. Another lesson that the author accuses Bush of ignoring is the one that the intelligence services had warned Bush about, that it was not safe for him to stay overnight in "Asia's first democratic nation." You know, as many Filipino critics later commented, Bush's interpretation of Philippine-American history bore very little relation to the facts and he continued, in his own way, to do things. Then, another lesson and example that the author accuses Bush of ignoring is that his concern about the Cold War ended a long time ago. The end of the Cold War created the conditions to finally realize the promise of Wilson's foreign policy. The great powers could now, as Wilson had hoped, form a “community of power” to manage and resolve the remaining conflicts. You know, that being said, the George HW Bush and Bill Clinton administrations intelligently understood the innovative possibility that existed. When Iraq invaded..