Topic > Euthanasia, assisted dying and right to die

The issue of euthanasia flourished considerably when a destitute Bangladeshi, Tofazzal Hossain of Meherpur, sought permission and sent a letter to the deputy commissioner of Meherpur to allow euthanasia of his two children and a grandson because they suffer from Duchenne muscular dystrophy which is a rare disease and there are no drugs. He had to make such a cruel decision because he lost all his property due to their care and there is no way to support them anymore. It is an extraordinary case for a conservative country like Bangladesh where there is effectively no flexibility in palliative/hospice care, even suicide is a crime and also people do not care who will make decisions during life support. This type of assisted suicide is impermissible both in the secular law of Bangladesh and from a religious perspective since the majority of the population is Muslim. Due to our existing social, cultural and religious customs, Bangladesh still shows disinterest in speculating on this topic. It is essential to note that people usually misinterpret between euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Black's Law Dictionary defines euthanasia as "The act or practice of painlessly putting to death persons suffering from incurable and painful diseases as an act of mercy." In general, it is interpreted that the doctor, permitted by law, would act directly, functioning as if administering a lethal injection, to end the patient's life, provided the patient and his family agree it can be done voluntarily with the patient's consent, involuntarily when the patient apparently gives no consent but is in a vegetative state will probably never regain consciousness In any case PAS differs from euthanasia, which consists of providing the competent patient with the prescription and then administering the lethal drug Euthanasia or the Physician-assisted suicide are illegal in most countries around the world. However, attitudes are changing and limited progress is seen regarding the legalization of euthanasia and PAS especially in the Western world. The Netherlands became the first country to legitimize euthanasia and PAS. Subsequently, active or passive euthanasia was legalized in Belgium, Colombia, Luxembourg, Canada and recently, on 7 March 2018, in India. Additionally, PAS is permitted in Germany, Switzerland, South Korea, Japan and the US states of Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Hawaii, Vermont, Montana, Washington DC and California. All these countries have changed the law abandoning their traditional ideas to give mortally ill patients the right to die with the collaboration of doctors. Countries allow such mercy killing only if certain conditions are met. For example, whether the patient is an adult or not, considering the patient's physical and mental situation, the consent of the guardian or witnesses, the approval of doctors, and so on. The law does not require the involvement of the doctor, but rather to create a legal situation relaxed enough to allow the individual to make decisions about his own life and to free himself from such a painful and intolerable life. In Bangladesh it is bad to think of legalizing euthanasia because since here even the attempted suicide is illegal and if it survives, according to Article 309 of the Penal Code 1860, it is punishable with imprisonment of up to one year, or with a fine , or with both. Furthermore, section 306 of the Penal Code 1860 is found in abetment of suicide: "If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such.