India. Bharat. Hindustan. India's 29 constituents make it what we know: a socially secular and economically developing nation on the path to success. But who really has the power? And what really holds them together? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The sentence “The first and most essential thing to learn about India is that there is not, and never has been, an India, or even just any country.” of India, which possesses, according to European ideas, any kind of unity, physical, political, social or religious…. It is impossible that the men of Punjab, Bengal, the North-Western Provinces and Madras should feel that they belong to one great nation.” It was made famous by John Strachey, a British colonial administrator in 1888. Now, considering that the basic policy of the British to hold power in a large but diverse country like India was to divide and rule, this phrase is not surprising. Since the beginning of time, historically if it were to be recorded, since the emergence of the Nanda dynasty in 322 BC, India has been a land for many prosperous dynasties who have sought to expand their empire acquiring parts of it or suing for peace or to wage war, in any case, none of the historical documents state that India was ever considered a nation as a whole. Just a home for nations whose rulers could change the moment someone decides to wield a sword. The name "India" comes from the Indus River, currently in Kashmir, India and parts of Pakistan; and this name was used to refer only to that part of the region which lay after the Indus River, not to the country which we now call India. The country, due to its abundance of resources, could hardly go unnoticed in the eyes of foreign rulers. Through the stages of history, it can be traced that when the Shungas ruled in Magadh (present-day Uttar Pradesh), the Satvahana dynasty started ruling the present-day Maharastra region, at the same time, the north-western region was under the control of the Kushan kings while the Cholas declared the southern part of the country as "Cholamandalam". What all these rulers had in common was not that they would eventually realize that they were all ruling a country we live in now, but that they were all ruling their own separate countries that belonged to the same continent. History plays a very important role in determining people's future actions and contemporary lifestyles. Subjects who lived under the monarchy of various different kings and queens, developed different languages, art forms, cultural styles of dress, festivals, cuisines subject to the type of vegetation cultivated, as well as their mental idea of ​​what they believed as a ideal "country". They began to believe that the borders of their region corresponded to the size of the country and that this was in their interest, people could not identify themselves as part of something larger or have a shared interest with another monarchy. The American states, with the help of the French monarchy, gained independence in 1776 and this movement led to the formation of the United States of America. The 'United States'. Here it can be seen that in a relatively modern society like the USA, the term 'United' is used for the country. This implies that the country is seen as a collective roof under which states reside. This is mainly due to the fact that Western culture has not experienced a series of multicultural rulers, which makes citizens feel as if they are "American" and not "from New York" or "from California". Where, on the one hand, the States.