Topic > Unlimited Restrictions on Abortion - 731

Abortion has always been a huge controversial debate in recent years and up until now in the United States and Oklahoma in particular. Since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on abortions in Roe V Wade in 1973, the state of Oklahoma has continued to restrict abortions by introducing new rules that pregnant women had to follow before any abortion procedures. Since that time, the percentage of abortions carried out in non-hospital clinics has increased from 51% in 1974 to 61% in 1976, reaching 95% in 2008 (Aksel, sarp, et al, 2013). However, there should be unlimited restrictions on abortion in Oklahoma because every woman should have complete control over her own body. The woman in Oklahoma should have complete control over her body because the woman has the right to make a choice about her body and no one can do that. the right to force her to keep a fetus she doesn't want for any reason. Some reasons (for example if the child comes from rape, incest or an illegal relationship, has serious health problems and will not live together, as well as suffers from his illnesses and puts the life of the pregnant woman at risk), they are logical and the woman has every right to do so. “A woman has the right not to keep a child born from rape or an illegal relationship because no woman wants to carry and raise a child – a sin – from her rapist. This child may be unloved and unwanted, so instead of bringing him into this life and making him suffer from not being loved or giving him to another family to adapt away from his real mother, abortion is the solution,” said Elise , 31 years old, French language teacher. Jessica and Erick Davis have their story and opinion on carrying and raising a fetus with serious health problems; in a poor town of Oklahoma City, in the center of the paper, the woman does not have to sacrifice her life for the unborn child. Works Cited* Carmon, Irin. “'I'm showing mercy to my son.”www.msnbc.com. Np, Oct. 31, 2013. Web. Nov. 12, 2013. .* Abreu, Sue H. “The Doctor's Dilemma with the Oklahoma Abortion Law's Ultrasound Requirement.” Oklahoma City University Law Review 37.2 (2012): 253-287.* Aksel, Sarp, et al. “Unintended Consequences: Abortion Education in the Post-Roe V Wade Years.” American Journal of Public Health. 103.3 (2012): 404-407.* Garfield, Jay L., and Patricia Hennessey. “Abortion, Moral and Legal Perspectives,” Amherst, mess: University of Massachusetts press, 1984. eBook Collection.* Nobis, Nathan and Abubakarr Sidique Jarr Koroma. “Abortion and Moral Arguments from the Analogy.” The American journal of bioethics: AJOB 10.12(2010):59-61.